Espiocracy News

What's happening / TLDR: Developer diaries introduce details of Espiocracy - Cold War strategy game in which you play as an intelligence agency. You can catch up with the most important dev diary (The Vision) and find out more on Steam page.

---

Welcome back,

Captivating games, movies, books have one trait in common - they tell fascinating stories. After all, storytelling is what we've been doing for thousands of years, gathered around the fire, learning how to hunt, inventing creation myths, and we continue to do so in the era of a global village.

Strategy games - despite their chess-spreadsheet-like nature - also tell stories, although usually implicitly, through unexpected outcomes or conflicts between players. Direct character-based stories were traditionally reserved for RPGs and adjacent genres, until titles such as Crusader Kings and Rimworld - both important inspirations for me - showed how a strategy game can feature rich storytelling based on characters. Espiocracy will push this side of the genre a little bit further.

What if we tie everything to characters? What if the world and countries represent groups of characters rather than bags of stats? What if characters include also organizations and sectors? There is better word for this kind of entity, coming straight out of the espionage lingo: actors, from the ability to act.

Transcript: Actors are tied to type-specific actions, managing relations, following agendas, developing capabilities, interacting with the player, and most importantly - building stories.

Actors will keep the world alive, create narratives from many points of view, represent plots running autonomously in the complex world. It should also not escape your attention that this system is designed precisely for a true espionage-based strategy game. Support a leader hostile to the enemy? Check. Break into Boeing design bureau? Check. Recruit Marilyn Monroe? Check. Use Yuri Gagarin in propaganda campaign? Check. Fund George Orwell? Check. Kidnap Gerard Depardieu? Wait a moment!

[h2]Actor Types[/h2]

Transcript: Table follows pattern of type (example subtypes) - example actors. Leader (president, military) - Stalin, MacArthur. Author (writer, director) - Orwell, Tarkovsky. Inventor (scientist, engineer) - Crick, von Braun. Pioneer (astronaut) - Gagarin. Celebrity (model) - Monroe. Political party (mass, cadre) - CPSU, Democratic. Social movement (pro-view, anti-view) - separatist, Ban the Bomb. Influential company (industry) - Volkswagen. Top research institution (nuclear) - Kurchatov Institute. Influential media (newspaper, TV channel) - Pravda, CBS. Large mob (Italian, Japanese) - Cosa Nostra, Yakuza. Trade union (miner) - NUM. Terrorist (local) - Red Army Faction. Guerilla (exiles) - 26th of July Movement. Religious (Orthodox) - Moscow Patriarchate. Sector (media, industry) - French media, US industry.

Actors are both historical and generated. The latter option is much more involved than a simple procedural generation: population serves as the source (to the point where, for instance, a leader can hold views that were popular when they were growing up), actors create other actors, void after loss of an actor is filled by another contender. Proper balance between historical and generated actors can be a personal thing for the player, therefore it will be highly configurable and moddable.

[h2]Activity[/h2]

Main actions are intuitive and correspond to the actor (sub)type. Examples include:

Transcript: Leader (president) can, for instance, declare a war or sign a treaty. Author (writer) can write a book or give an interview. Political party can promote a candidate or support a movement. Social movement can protest or influence politicians.

There are also three universal groups of actions:

• Interacting with other actors (to the point of friends and enemies)
  
• Balancing internal growth and external actions (spending limited resources)
  
• Moving between countries (rare but sometimes significant, for instance former leader fleeing country after an invasion to establish government-in-exile)
  

Activity shapes not only the history, but also the fate of the actor. Some actions are more optimal in specific contexts, but actors - like in the real life - are not always rational. Instead, their actions are guided by competence, traits, and goals. It adds an interesting layer of complexity especially at the level of leaders, as you can probably imagine consequences of electing an incompetent leader...

[h2]Influence[/h2]

All actors represented in the game are actually influential actors - important or at least potentially important for the fate of the whole country.

Actor's influence is quantified to a single parameter, defined by:

• Recent actions and their results
  
• Current role in the legal system
  
• Size (in the case of organizations)
  
• Relations
  
• History
  

As with many other features of the game, influence is two-way street. On the one hand, it is meticulously acquired by actors over years. On the other hand, it unlocks actions, defines their reach, and is subject to dramatic changes. For example: a writer with low influence suddenly succeeds with a bestseller and hugely increases own influence, because now the country (or even the whole world) listens to the interviews and waits for the next book. And the player can interact with the author to push them into ridiculing Western or Eastern systems... (Yes, Orwell-Huxley vibes!)

Influence system neatly clarifies some complex mechanisms. Some leaders have no legal power (not enough influence) to declare war on their own, authors writing in lingua franca English have wider global reach (higher influence) than other authors, cartel parties can naturally emerge by accumulating influence and gatekeeping it from new parties, and so on.

[h2]Great Man Theory[/h2]

Let's address an elephant in the room. Is it "Great Man Theory The Game"?

The answer is straightforward: no.

Classic (Napoleonic) great man theory is out of the question, since there are incompetent leaders and those who are competent, can posses ill-fated views and negative traits.

Modern great man theory deserves more detailed rebuttal. Folks in discussions adjacent to Paradox games often equal the theory with apples and oranges. First approach, probably closer to the historical discourse, assumes that high-ranking individuals were largely products of their environments. I think this is a fair approach to history and I reflect that in the design: individual persons come from and are rooted in the population, population itself creates actors and is represented by actors such as social movements. In addition, fate of many actors lies in the hands of the common folk (by changing influence, reacting to actions, voting in elections, and so on) - which is also tied directly to views held by the population.

Now on to the oranges: sometimes discussion around great man theory quickly evolves into discussion about historical determinism. It's not hard to find voices equaling the theory with a view that Stalin, in the case of earlier death, would be replaced by an approximate copy of Stalin, because high-ranking individuals are deterministic slaves of history (shout-out to Tolstoy!). This approach is strongly rejected by the game on very simple grounds - deterministic history would be boring.

[h2]Final Remarks[/h2]

The next dev diary will explore the first method of interaction with actors - Contacts and Targets - on October 1st.

If you're not already wishlisting Espiocracy, consider doing it:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1670650/Espiocracy/

There is also a small community around Espiocracy:


---
"Chess is not a game. Chess is well-defined form computation. Real games, real life consists of bluffing, of little tactics and deception, of asking yourself what is the other man going to think I mean to do" - John Von Neumann

What's happening / TLDR: Developer diaries introduce details of Espiocracy - Cold War strategy game in which you play as an intelligence agency. You can catch up with the most important dev diary (The Vision) and find out more on Steam page.

---

Howdy,

After ideologies (DD#3) and populations (DD#4), we will explore the third corner of political triangle in Espiocracy: political parties.

Transcript: Triangle of political parties, populations, and ideologies with views.

Here, political parties are living and breathing entities. Very much like the Cold War parties, they can be weaponized, serve as voice magnifier for the population, or, conversely, suppress the masses as an omnipresent organ of control.

To ensure tight integration with core gameplay, political parties are represented in the wider framework of non-state influential actors, alongside other organizations and individuals. To summarize this concept in one sentence: every country has a set of actors who shape the history and directly interact with the player. The next dev diary will be in full dedicated to various actors - meanwhile, we will take closer look at parties as a special case of an influential actor in the game.

[h2]Properties of Political Parties[/h2]

Transcript: Czechoslovak National Socialist Party. Cadre party representing liberal nationalism. Founded in 1897, known for WW2 resistance. Further described by example sections of: internal parameters, factions, recent activities, relationships, tactical intelligence, goals, future activities, past interactions.

Political parties are divided into four subtypes: mass, cadre, cadre-mass, and underground.

Particular subtypes differ in actions and growth dynamics. Mass party will focus on attracting millions of people, building large bureaucratic apparatus, and funding its activity with dues collected from members. Cadre party, instead, will cater to other influential actors, raise funds between wealthy individuals, and preserve hermetic staff composition, for better or worse.

As a whole organization, parties are associated with a single ideology, supplied by a set of additional views. However, they also have internal life in the form factions with ideologies and views of their own. In the case of CSNS, 91% of members subscribe to Zenkl's faction of liberal nationalism, which understandably dominates the party. At the same time, there is a small faction, led by Slechta, which prefers moderate socialism. Following real life events, Zenkl's faction can be purged out of the party, leading to the change of primary ideology, dropping "nationalist" from the name, and changing subtype. In addition to this example, factions are involved in a few more processes, such as choice of the candidate for elections or bloc parties absorbing smaller parties.

[h2]Activity of Political Parties[/h2]

Political parties have long-term goals, defined by previous and current situation. Objectives are fairly simple and range from survival to dominating global political life. These, along with possibilities (defined by members, funds, and so on), translate into actions. Non-comprehensive list of examples includes:

• Intensive campaigns (in addition to standard agitation)
  
• Pressing a policy (if present in legislature)
  
• Raising funds
  
• Modifying ideology
  
• Restructuring
  
• Interacting with other actors and the player in plethora of ways
  

Political parties will essentially play a game in their own decision space, balancing internal growth with external activity. At the same time, they do not exist in the void - parties develop cordial or hostile relations with other actors and the intelligence agency controlled by the player.

Without spoiling next dev diaries about the precise nature of these interactions, here is an example of an intelligence operation which can be recreated in the game: British Socialist Party received (allegedly!) financial support from CIA but with strings attached - the agency demanded suppression of the communist faction within the party.

In addition to direct interaction, there is also information-wise aspect of gameplay surrounding actors: some knowledge is hidden and has to be acquired (represented as lines crossed out in black). It can be particularly useful if you gain insight into planned actions and react before they even happen!

[h2]Position of Political Parties[/h2]

Transcript: Presidential-parliamentary democracy with two leaders: President Edvard Benes and Prime Minister Klement Gottwald. Legislature, named as Constituent National Assembly, features six parties and has coalition involving all of them. Next election is expected in two years, to the parliament, with communist party currently at the top of polls.

Fruits of the struggle for power are defined by local political system. The game features democracies and autocracies with many subtypes (such as crowned democracy or multiparty autocracy). Actual government is represented by two bodies: leader(s) and legislature. Their role and election, in addition to rules dictated by the system, depends also on the strength of the system itself and individual actors. There are also variants such as external control or de facto leader in the backseat instead of a president or a prime minister.

Position of political parties can be changed by policies. On the one hand, the reach and influence can be expanded as was the case in USSR. On the other hand, specific organizations can be outright banned, which results in either total withdrawal or transformation into an underground party. The latter status strips such a party of legal actions, but at the same time opens the gates of new illegal activities. Sometimes banning a party can - probably with the assistance of an intelligence agency - literally weaponize it, similarly to some WW2 resistance movements.

[h2]Election[/h2]

In democracies, depending on the system type, population votes for political parties, candidates proposed by political parties, jointly for both government bodies, or in a referendum regarding specific issue. Sheer popular support follows alignment between parties/issue and the population. However, it doesn't directly translate to ballot paper. Election results are skewed by:

• Voting rights (eg. women and indigenous populations barred from voting)
  
• Semi-legal suppression (eg. racial intimidation)
  
• Direct vote fraud (up to rigged or sham elections)
  
• Repressing opposition (eg. political arrests)
  

(Campaigns before elections, including propaganda operations executed by the player, do not modify election results directly - instead, they affect views in the population. This is very important, since one can promote a view among an ethnic group and do not influence elections, because this group cannot vote.)

[h2]Final remarks[/h2]

The next dev diary - "Influential actors" - will be posted on September 17th.

If you're not already wishlisting Espiocracy, consider doing it:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1670650/Espiocracy/

There is also a small community around Espiocracy:


---
"It's got to look democratic, but we must have everything under our control" - Walter Ulbricht, First Secretary of Socialist Unity Party in East Germany (attributed)

What's happening / TLDR: Developer diaries introduce details of Espiocracy - Cold War strategy game in which you play as an intelligence agency. You can catch up with the most important dev diary (The Vision) or find out more on Steam page.

---

Hello there!

After introduction of Views & Ideologies in the previous dev diary, today we take a quick look at holders of these beliefs: populations.

Common folk forms the backbone of historical simulation in Espiocracy. Representation of populations is tailored to the Cold War processes, such as migrations, conflicts, and decolonization. Role of the masses in the game can be summarized in two words: political impact.

Transcript: Population of a country is described by geographic distribution of ethnic groups which hold views and have parameters. Populations make history in elections, movements, influential actors, and participation in conflicts. They are affected by propaganda campaigns, history before 1946, crises, conflicts, policies, migration.

[h2]Population Distribution[/h2]

Instead of provinces known from other grand strategy games, Espiocracy proposes area-based representation of world data. Currently, the design relies on population grids of cells 50 by 50 kilometers.

Transcript: Czechoslovakia is covered by 19 cells with different shades of blue, corresponding to population density.

Every cell - in addition to classic terrain modifiers, supplied by history and economy - contains number of people belonging to specific ethnic group. It allows fairly granular gameplay around internal conflicts: ethnic animosities within the same area, civil wars and local interaction with them, separatist campaigns with whole regions pressing for independence. At the same time, cells assist international conflicts, up to nuclear war and famous comparison of "dense and vulnerable USA" to "vast and hard to target USSR". (In case it's not clear: cells reside only in the population layer, borders won't be square-ish!)

Most populous places - capitals, aglomerations, industrial complexes - have special status of a population center. First and foremost, it defines them as locations of intelligence operations, providing different environments within the same country (for instance: West German Frankfurt in comparison to West Berlin). Moreover, they play important role in conflicts - their takeover in a civil war can be a decisive event, loss in the conventional war is also significant (to mention again West Berlin, the game gives Soviets important reasons to capture the zone), and you can be sure that mutually assured destruction will target these places. In addition, population centers also play role in migrations, both internal (urbanization process) and external (foreign immigration to New York or Paris instead of countryside, advancing internationalization of large cities).

[h2]Population Groups[/h2]

There are various possible ways to divide population - by occupation, wealth, religion. Espiocracy will divide populations by ethnicity (understood more widely than usual, that is including religion in certain regions).

Ethnic groups won't possess any innate parameters. They will be characterized by spatial and quantitative distribution, dictated by starting date of 1946 and ongoing simulation. Moreover, they will be compared on matrix of social proximity: any two given groups will have a single value, which attempts to summarize how close they are in terms of history, language, and culture. On the one hand, it is designed for espionage-focused gameplay (as in the old joke about an American spying in Russia). On the other hand, it will assist state-ordered discrimination, internal conflicts, assimilation, and decolonization struggles.

[h2]Activity[/h2]

Populations do not have any kind of unrest parameter. Instead, their discontent is represented organically by views. But how do they translate views into political impact, apart from elections if they happen to live on the democratic side of the world?

Activity of the population is distilled into active entities, called influential actors. An actor can be anything that has concrete goals, agenda, possible actions, and - as the name suggests - real influence. In the context of population, influential actors can be:

• campaigners
  
• movements
  
• trade unions
  
• terror groups
  
• guerilla groups
  
• political leaders
  

Any of them can directly emerge from population - especially in times of crises and conflicts. This is the most important part of the gameplay: influential actors are an absolute core of Espiocracy, the most central element, on which relies the simulation and with which the player constantly interacts - and there will be more than one whole dev diary dedicated to them.

Coming back to elections, political parties are also influential actors. Their support by the population is primarily materialized in elections, but autocracies also can be politically active - for instance, banned ideologies and political parties can still function in the underground. Details of parties as a special case of an influential actor are coming in two weeks.

[h2]Final remarks[/h2]

The next dev diary - "Political parties" - will be posted on September 3rd.

If you're not already wishlisting Espiocracy, consider doing it:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1670650/Espiocracy/

There is also a small community around Espiocracy:


---
"The liberal reward of labour, as it is to the effect of increasing wealth, so it is the cause of increasing population" - Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations

What's happening / TLDR: Developer diaries introduce details of Espiocracy - Cold War strategy game in which you play as an intelligence agency. You can catch up with the most important dev diary (The Vision) or find out more on Steam page.

---

Hi Folks!

The struggle between ideologies was central to World War II, Cold War, and War on Terrorism. It will also be the pivotal part of Espiocracy.

Paraphrasing Richard Feynmann, in order to model an ideology from scratch, the game first invents the universe. Historical events before 1946 and events happening during player's campaign - from military invasions to bestselling books - have not only physical consequences, but are also met with mental reaction of populations and individual actors. This reaction is represented by a view: mix of opinion, worldview, and belief.

Views build ideologies. But it doesn't end there, as some views can become more than tenets of ideologies: they represent collective memory, cultural transmission, long-held grievances, exceptionalism, discrimination, myths, conspiracy theories, and everything in between.

Transcript: Events influence population and non state-actors by changing views held by the people. Acquired views, in turn, affect decisions which lead to further events.

In this system, views essentially tie causes with effects. They provide reasons behind decisions made by actors and reactions to consequences of these decisions. Moreover, views affect other views both in evolution over time and in specific decisions, creating symphony of history played by an orchestra of views. And you modify the ensemble in the middle of performance (by assassinating the violinist and blackmailing the pianist).

[h2]Example Views[/h2]

Technically, a view in the game is mental state towards a subject. States can be as simple as "pro-" or as multilayered as "resentment". Subjects touch everything that exists or can be done in the game world.

There was a single very prominent view which dominated political decisions and lives of populations during the Cold War:

Transcript: Fear of nuclear war. Recent influences: +3.04 New Yorker report, +0.22 collective memory. Main cause: Hiroshima bombings (1945). Influence on other subjects: -0.6 war, +0.1 religion, +0.7 military. Direct effects: preparing for nuclear war, decision paralysis.

Its prevalence has been recently increased by famous John Hersey's report about irradiated victims of atomic bombs. The view has strong connections to other views: holders want to avoid the war but at the same time they support expansion of defensive military capabilities. Directly in decision making, as we would expect from fear, sometimes it motivates preparation and sometimes it delays engagement. Will Soviet leader dive head-first into Korean War, given his fear of nuclear conflict? Are people going to elect a warmongering candidate, when their children are raised on "Duck and Cover"? How decades of life in fear will affect a generation that no longer remembers the hell of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Views are usually local - their causes can be similarly intimate. German populations begin with:

Transcript: Guilt after the war. Recent influences: +0.10 collective memory. Main cause: Holocaust (1942-1945). Connections: -0.8 violence, -0.6 military, -0.5 war, -0.2 nation. Direct effects: willing to make reparations, avoiding aggressive decisions.

This view, recognized by Carl Jung as Kollektivschuld, is not without controversies, but there is no hidden bias - the game is clear about assumptions being made. Pacifying effect of guilt after the war is strong. It may loom over local population and politicians for decades, maybe even continue into the 21st century. Is it possible to push population holding this view into a war? Can patriotic views survive the stigma? Are foreign powers going to use and abuse this view against the national interest?

Transcript: "Diese Schandtaten: Eure Schuld!" - "These atrocities: your fault!". Campaign of US War Department.

[h2]Example Ideology[/h2]

Ideologies in Espiocracy will be represented by hierarchical lists of views with common maintainers and sources (causes).

Transcript: Government ideology - stalinist communism. Views: cult of Joseph Stalin, pro-authoritarian, focus on industry, blaming landowners, pro-collectivist, solidarity with workers, solidarity with peasants, anti-capitalist, superiority of state planning, blaming bourgeois, expecting class conflict, anti-colonialist, socialism in one country. Sources: Capital by Marx (1867-1883), Lenin works (1893-1923), Stalin constitution (1936).
(Views can have special names. Here, "socialism in one country" is pro-isolationist view - not ideal but good enough as a model of influence on decisions.)

The list is not fixed: views and their order evolve over time. Changes (up to introduction of new sources) are made by maintainers - leaders, political parties, other actors - who also popularize the whole ideology and its constituent views. Popular support of the ideology depends on alignment between its views and population's views, which is recognized and utilized by political entities. This is two-way street: populations and ideologies influence themselves back and forth. On top of that, given special causes, some ideologies are directly supported or opposed (you can't have McCarthyism without anti-communist view!).

Ideologies here are understood as political ideologies, which usually guide actions of a political party, movement, or even guerilla group:

Transcript: Other political ideologies. Social democracy (45%, SPD). Christian democracy (23%, CDU). Nazi fascism (20%, illegal). Liberal democracy (11%, LDP).

Ideologies are fairly granular. It's not enough to have communism or even Soviet communism - stalinist variant is the level that Espiocracy aims for, allowing modelling of stalinism pushed into eastern and southern Europe, later takeover by revisionists, and Sino-Soviet divide with famous "70% right, 30% wrong". This is heavily utilized by the simulation: ideologies are split like religious heresies, general ideologies are used as a foundation for more detailed systems, some actors can create new political approaches.

International spreading of ideologies is as central to the game as has been to the Cold War. Alignments between ideologies control diplomacy. Friendly relations are natural for countries believing in similar views - and vice versa, hostilities can be fueled solely by ideological antagonisms. The map is painted with ideologies. Their promotion, installation or even imposing is one of the main ways to win the game.

[h2]Interacting with Views & Ideologies[/h2]

An intelligence agency is ideally suited for the interaction with views and ideologies. By targeting actors and launching propaganda campaigns, you will:

• Influence elections
  
• Ignite and accelerate social conflicts
  
• Instigate strikes, insurgencies, civil wars
  
• Mold existing ideologies
  
• Eliminate ideologies (legally or even entirely, do you remember how stalinism withered away?)
  
• Change views of individual actors
  
• Manufacture views and ideologies
  
• Counter foreign propaganda campaigns
  
• Deal with views held by your operatives
  

[h2]Final Remarks[/h2]

Screenshots are obviously very early work in progress. Many topics touched today will be expanded in further dev diaries. At the end of the day, dev diary is meant to be just a short introduction - there's much more to the implementation of views and ideologies in Espiocracy (for instance, subjects are organized by word2vec-inspired system), which I hope you'll test with your own hands!

The next dev diary - "Populations" - will be posted on August 20th.

If you're not already wishlisting Espiocracy, consider doing it:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1670650/Espiocracy/

There is also a small community around Espiocracy:


---
"We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of" - Edward Bernays

Hello Everyone!

What's happening / TLDR: Developer diaries introduce details of the upcoming strategy game Espiocracy. You can catch up with the first dev diary (The Vision) or find out more about the game on Steam page.

1946 is the starting year in Espiocracy. Second World War just ended and relations between two superpowers - USSR and USA - are deterioriating.

Transcription: From June 1945 to June 1946, the world has seen atomic bombings, Truman hostility towards USSR, Kennan's long telegram, Churchill iron curtain speech, capture of Alan Nunn May, elections won by communists in Czechoslovakia, and constitutional referendum won by democrats in Italy.

After defeat of the great enemy, the fate of former alliance is already decided. However, many events that led to the Cold War in the shape as we know it are still bound to happen, as the start of the Cold War is usually situated closer to 1947. This early day-one interaction is crucial element of fun in Espiocracy - imagine changing the outcome of Czechoslovak elections or Italian referendum, and turning around further history in the corresponding regions.

[h2]Simulation[/h2]

1946 is also the foundation of Espiocracy's simulation design. Most of the processes critical for the Cold War were already set in motion. Moreover, many alternative history approaches were well represented by the proximity of WW2.

The game will simulate the following historical processes, starting from 01.01.1946:

• Occupation
  
• Civil wars
  
• Trials and hunts
  
• Government form changes
  
• New countries, separations and unifications
  
• Large population migrations
  
• Nuclear research, leading to bombs and power plants
  
• Missile development and further space race
  
• Technological progress

Most of them will receive dedicated dev diaries. Needless to say, all of them will be under player's influence.

[h2]Berlin Station[/h2]

There's one fascinating historical source from 1946, which sits right at the foundation of Espiocracy. It's 90-pages-long CIA report from early activities of an intelligence station in Berlin, with its author managing the station exactly since January 1946.

Berlin was a special place in the Cold War, often called the capital of spies. Its early days were even more special, due to destruction after the war, relatively unconstrained movement, and conflict between communist and liberal political parties. In this environment, covert operations should be pretty exciting - and they were! Just look at this passage about... American sabotage of Soviet uranium deposits:

Transcript: There was certain gratification in being able to pinpoint a target anywhere in the Russian Zone, and dispatch an agent to cover it almost at a moment's notice. Perhaps the classic operation of this type was the surveillance of a large cache of uranium salts at Ludwigslust, which we carried out for the Manhattan Engineering District. We could put a man into the warehouse almost at will, and from afar we watched with satisfaction the elimination of the dangerous salts by their use in tanning white leather.

Or this striking fragment about spy networks in East Germany:

Transcript: The ultimate moral, and it is a painful one, seems to be that any successful productive operation must eventually be paid for by an even greater outlay of effort in disposal and liquidation. For that reason, perhaps the most important outside development of 1947 affecting FR operations was the organization of the disposal unit at Heidelberg. Their responsibility is a heavy one, for they have to suffer dismal headaches long after the shouting and the tumult have died away.

Screenshots above refer to the first part of the gameplay in Espiocracy - major operations. Ultimately, the station report focuses on the regular espionage, which is the second part of the gameplay (a.k.a. regular activities), for instance:

Transcript: First Frankfurt requested, and then Washinghton required, that we elevate military intelligence, especially Order of Battle of the Soviet armed forces, to the highest priority, at no matter what cost to our other operations. The effect on our positive operations was of course sweeping; in some respects it was disastrous.

Declassified numbers suggest scale of these activities. There were 27-40 employees, 200-500 intelligence reports monthly, up to 125 handled agents. In addition to spying on the Red Army, the station also infiltrated German police, Soviet press in Berlin, and local interior agency. Authors stated interesting reasons behind these actions - such as ensuring there is no revival of Nazi movement and confronting Soviet intelligence services which disguised their operatives as journalists.

Among other things, early acitivity of American Berlin station directly proves that there was a lot to do already in 1946 from the perspective of an intelligence agency preparing for the Cold War.

[h2]Final Remarks[/h2]

Currently, only a single starting point - 1946 - is planned for Espiocracy. The game will cover at least the whole Cold War (to 1990), but the overall goal is historical coverage up to the last year (2020).

Short anecdote at the end of the dev diary: one of the first fully-playable prototypes was set in modern 2021, but after upgrades with historical scenarios I discovered that intelligence mechanisms provide much more fun when set in the past. If you search deep enough in Google Play Store, you might even find this prototype :)

If you're not already wishlisting Espiocracy, consider doing it:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1670650/Espiocracy/

Also, small community around Espiocracy has been just launched:



The next dev diary - "Ideologies and Views" - will be posted on 6th of August.

---
Photo credit: Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-S74639 / CC-BY-SA 3.0

"Developing sphere of usefulness and prestige, while maintaining the passion for anonymity" - chief of CIA's Berlin station about his task