The first review is in!
It is always scary to send out your work to a third party for review, especially if you are a part-time solo indie game developer that has worked the last 5 years on a game about your grandmother's legacy. While I have worked on a lot of games in my past, Brukel marks the first time that I programmed a 3D game by myself, so I am not very confident about my work, especially considering the quality of other games out there.
Seriously. There are so many amazing games out there! In fact, I had to force myself to stop playing games similar to Brukel altogether, just for my mental health. When you are grinding through every little bug and every silly issue that exists in your own game, it is simply not healthy to see how good the competition for it is.
So when my students raved about Layers of Fear and how they are doing things similar to what I am doing in Brukel... That sure sounds lovely, but I didn't play it.
Then Attentat 1942 won an award at Games For Change with a concept similar to Brukel but with actors instead of actual survivors... Fascinating. but yeah... Didn't play it.
How about when my friend and fellow professor/solo developer Dave Beck released Tombeaux... Surely I did play... Nope. I bought it to support him, but didn't play it.
Over the last 5 years, I bought tons of games like Brukel to support the developers -as I know what they went through to make it- but I did not play them. Until last weekend.
Last weekend, I finally conjured up the courage to try one of the games like Brukel that I had sitting in my Steam library, promising myself that I would muster up the strength to finish Brukel even if it would just fall utterly short in comparison to the game I was going to play.
Fortunately, Brukel held up well. Even if my game was a little less polished, I walked away feeling good about Brukel, feeling that I did the very best that I could with it: an emotional experience that is definitely on par with what I saw from the competition.
Which was quite the relief, but obviously, I am biased. Even if the playtests went well, even if the exhibits went well. What will the critics say? What will the Internet say?
I guess at this point it is clear why I wanted to write a far too long post about getting my first positive review for the game. It will always something that I cherish, so thanks so much to the Indie Hive for their kind words, and especially this line:
Brukel has never been about profit to me. In fact, the money it raises will go to porting the game to other platforms and/or making another game that brings someone's life history back to life. Instead, Brukel is about making people feel the world through someone else's eyes, through someone else's experiences. That the game managed to do that for at least one person so far, makes it all worth it.
Read the full review here.
Seriously. There are so many amazing games out there! In fact, I had to force myself to stop playing games similar to Brukel altogether, just for my mental health. When you are grinding through every little bug and every silly issue that exists in your own game, it is simply not healthy to see how good the competition for it is.
So when my students raved about Layers of Fear and how they are doing things similar to what I am doing in Brukel... That sure sounds lovely, but I didn't play it.
Then Attentat 1942 won an award at Games For Change with a concept similar to Brukel but with actors instead of actual survivors... Fascinating. but yeah... Didn't play it.
How about when my friend and fellow professor/solo developer Dave Beck released Tombeaux... Surely I did play... Nope. I bought it to support him, but didn't play it.
Over the last 5 years, I bought tons of games like Brukel to support the developers -as I know what they went through to make it- but I did not play them. Until last weekend.
Last weekend, I finally conjured up the courage to try one of the games like Brukel that I had sitting in my Steam library, promising myself that I would muster up the strength to finish Brukel even if it would just fall utterly short in comparison to the game I was going to play.
Fortunately, Brukel held up well. Even if my game was a little less polished, I walked away feeling good about Brukel, feeling that I did the very best that I could with it: an emotional experience that is definitely on par with what I saw from the competition.
Which was quite the relief, but obviously, I am biased. Even if the playtests went well, even if the exhibits went well. What will the critics say? What will the Internet say?
I guess at this point it is clear why I wanted to write a far too long post about getting my first positive review for the game. It will always something that I cherish, so thanks so much to the Indie Hive for their kind words, and especially this line:
Hearing Bie’s voice throughout and being able to connect the scenarios to real people, conjures strong feelings of empathy for those that experience the terrible violence of war, whilst reminding the player that they will (probably) never fully understand.
Brukel has never been about profit to me. In fact, the money it raises will go to porting the game to other platforms and/or making another game that brings someone's life history back to life. Instead, Brukel is about making people feel the world through someone else's eyes, through someone else's experiences. That the game managed to do that for at least one person so far, makes it all worth it.
Read the full review here.