Not Guilty! News

[h2]👋 Hello, Judges!
🕵️‍♂️ Greetings, Detectives![/h2][p]
The investigation continues!
If you missed the start — check the link and catch up 🗂️[/p][p][/p][h3]Today we go further:[/h3][p]
🕵️‍♀️ One new clue
👂 One new witness[/p][p][/p][h3]🖌️ Clue: Brush marks on the tiles[/h3][p]
Analysis shows dried mayo traces and greasy strokes on the tiles. Experts say the brush was medium-stiff, with oil residue in the bristles. Partial fingerprints are visible on the handle, but quality is low — the culprit was clearly in a hurry.[/p][h3]
Who could it be?[/h3][p]
— Samuel Cotton (suspect #1)
— Martin Larson (janitor)
— Julia Hunt (gallery owner)[/p][h3]
Coincidence? Doubtful. Let’s move on.[/h3][p][/p][h3]👂 Testimony: Julia Hunt, gallery owner[/h3][p]
“Samuel? A genius… and a disaster for public parks. But that night he was with me — looking for an old brush, mumbling about ‘great strokes on bronze.’ I’m not sure if he left before I closed the gallery…”[/p][p][/p][h3]❓ What do you think, detectives?[/h3][p]
🖌️ Do the marks point to Samuel? Or is this a setup?
📌 Who left the greasy strokes — the artist, or someone else?[/p][p][/p][h3]Comment your guesses! We’re getting closer to the truth.[/h3][p][/p][h3]🚨 Let’s go, detectives! Make your verdict![/h3][h3]
💡 The best theories will be featured in the next post![/h3]

[h2]👋 Hello, Judges!
🕵️‍♂️ Greetings, Detectives![/h2][p]
The city is in turmoil again. A strange, sticky case that clearly needs our attention. Time to investigate![/p][p][/p][h3]📝 Case Description:[/h3][p]
At night, someone broke into the city park and drenched all the monuments in mayonnaise. Busts are glistening, plaques are dripping, and pigeons avoid the slippery surfaces. By morning, City Hall called an emergency meeting — the park became the talk of the town.[/p][p]
The main suspect: Samuel Cotton, a provocative performance artist known for his critiques of the “bronze cult.”[/p][p]
Samuel claims he spent the night working on a new painting series called “The White Trail.”[/p][p][/p][h3]🔍 Available Evidence:[/h3][p]
– An empty mayonnaise bucket
– Brush marks on tiles near the statue
– A tube labeled “Light Mayo” found in the bushes[/p][p][/p][h3]👂 Witness Testimonies:[/h3][p]
– Martin Larson, janitor (discovered the “artwork” in the morning)
– Julia Hunt, gallery owner and acquaintance of Samuel[/p][p][/p][h3]❓ Which clue will crack the case? Whose testimony should come first?[/h3][p]
Comment below — pick 1 piece of evidence and 1 witness. We’ll be back soon with an update and one step closer to the truth![/p][p][/p][h2]🚨 Onward, detectives! Give your verdict![/h2][h3]
💡 Got your own theory? Share it — the best ones will be featured in the next post![/h3]

[h2]🌟 Hello, Judges!
🎩 Greetings, Detectives![/h2][p][/p][p]This is the end. The clues have formed a clear picture. The witnesses have said everything they know. It’s time to deliver the verdict.[/p][p][/p][h3]🧤 Clue: Shovel with manure traces[/h3][p]Experts found Jack Hitch’s fingerprints on the handle.[/p][p][/p][h3]🗣 Testimony: Klaus Barbon, postman[/h3][p]"I saw Hitch near the fence. He looked like he was up to something… foul."[/p][p][/p][h3]⚖️ Verdict: GUILTY![/h3][p]Jack Hitch is guilty. His alibi about the fair fell apart — the judge doubts it was really him. The shoeprint by the fence was size 43 — his size. The new evidence and testimony left no room for doubt.[/p][p][/p][h3]✅ Case Closed![/h3][p]Congrats to the detectives who caught Hitch. Your analytical skills are impressive.[/p][h3]Don’t get too comfortable — more bizarre cases and twisted mysteries are ahead![/h3]

[h2]🔍 Hello, Judges!
🕵️‍♂️ Salute, Detectives![/h2][p]The investigation continues!
Missed the beginning? Catch up \[at this link] 📂[/p][hr][/hr][p]Today, we're taking a big step forward:[/p][p]🔎 One clue revealed
🗣️ One witness questioned[/p][hr][/hr][p][/p][p][/p][h3]👣 Clue: Bootprints near the fence[/h3][p]Soil analysis, footprint scans, and pattern comparison reveal: size 43 boots.[/p][p]Whose size is that?[/p][p]— Jack Hitch (primary suspect)
— Tom Sawyer (victim of the manure strike)
— Klaus Barbon (the local postman)[/p][p]Coincidence? Doubtful. Let’s keep digging.[/p][hr][/hr][h3]🧓 Witness: Margaret Grinson, judge at the fair[/h3]

[p]“Jack Hitch? Oh yes, he won the raw corn eating contest!
Though… I didn’t recognize him at first.
Big beard, dark glasses, raspy voice — I hadn’t seen him in years.
Time hasn’t been kind to him... or maybe... are you suggesting it wasn’t really him?”[/p]

[hr][/hr][h3]What do you think, detectives?[/h3][p]🧠 Who left the footprints?
🕶 Was Jack really at the fair — or is someone pretending to be him?[/p][p]We’ll be back soon with more clues and get one step closer to the truth![/p][hr][/hr][p]Drop your theory in the comments:
🔸 Pick 1 clue
🔸 Pick 1 witness
💬 And tell us what you think happened![/p][p]👍 Like the theories you agree with — and whoever gets closest will be named
"Top Detective" in the next case![/p][h3]Let’s go, detectives — it’s verdict time![/h3]

[h2]Hello, Judges![/h2][h2]Salute, Detectives![/h2][p]We’ve just received our first suspect. Let’s investigate the case and deliver a verdict![/p][hr][/hr][p][/p][h3]Case Brief:[/h3][p]On a sunny Sunday afternoon, a pile of manure flew into the Sawyer family’s backyard during their daughter’s birthday party.[/p][p]The head of the family, Tom, was hit right in the face by the “fertilizer.” The cake didn’t survive either. The guests were emotionally scarred. The daughter was last seen crying in the bushes.[/p][p]The prime suspect behind the “manure attack” is Jack Hitch — a grumpy neighbor with a known hatred for birthdays. Tom swears he saw Jack’s hat by the fence just moments before the incident.[/p][p]Jack claims he was out of town that day at a cabbage fair, where he won a raw corn eating contest.[/p][hr][/hr][h3]Available evidence:[/h3]

• [p]A shovel with manure traces[/p]
• [p]Bootprints near the fence[/p]

[h3]Witnesses:[/h3]

• [p]Margaret Grinson, judge at the cabbage fair contests[/p]
• [p]Klaus Barbon, the local postman[/p]

[hr][/hr][h3]Which piece of evidence will crack the case?
Whose testimony should we hear first?[/h3][p]Choose 1 clue and 1 witness, and post your verdict in the comments. We’ll be back with an update soon — and one step closer to the truth![/p][hr][/hr][p]Let’s go, detectives — deliver your verdict![/p][p]And don’t forget — feel free to suggest your own theory in the comments. Like the ones you agree with! The closest guess will be honored in the next case as our "Top Detective"![/p]