Not Guilty! News

[h2]👋 Hey there, judges!
🕵️‍♂️ What’s up, detectives![/h2][p]
The investigation continues! If you missed the beginning — check the link to catch up 🗂️[/p][p][/p][p][/p][p]This is the end. The clues have formed a full picture, and the witnesses have told us everything they know. It’s time for the verdict.[/p][p][/p][h3]🪶 Clue: Feather with sugar glaze[/h3][p]
Experts found traces of the same glaze Luis Drake uses for his caramel birds. And his fingerprints were on the feather’s handle.[/p][p][/p][h3]👂 Witness: Hugh Jenkins, student volunteer[/h3][p]
“Luis? He came to me asking for the museum keys ‘for a night photo project’. I refused… but I think he still found a way to get inside. I heard footsteps at night but thought it was the janitor.”[/p][p][/p][h3]⚖️ Verdict: GUILTY![/h3][p]
🍬 Luis Drake is guilty. He wanted to create his loudest “edible performance” yet and lure visitors to his new gallery show. The fingerprints and witness statements left no doubt.[/p][p][/p][h3]✅ Case closed![/h3][h3]
Congratulations to the detectives who figured out Drake. Your analytical skills are impressive![/h3][p][/p][h3]🔥 Don’t relax — new cases and even trickier mysteries are coming.[/h3]

[h2]👋 Hey there, judges!
🕵️‍♂️ What’s up, detectives![/h2][p]
The investigation continues! If you missed the beginning — check the link to catch up 🗂️[/p][p][/p][p][/p][h3]Today we take a step forward:[/h3][p]🔎 examine one clue
👂 listen to one witness[/p][p][/p][h3]🍭 Clue: “A piece of candy with teeth marks”[/h3][p]
Experts examined the candy carefully. They found teeth marks belonging to an adult male missing two front teeth. The candy also had traces of strawberry syrup and sugar crumbs — the same ones found on the museum floor.[/p][p][/p][h3]Who does this match?[/h3][p]
— Luis Drake (Suspect #1)
— Hugh Jenkins (student volunteer)
— An unknown night visitor[/p][p][/p][h3]Coincidence? Unlikely. But let’s move on.[/h3][p][/p][h3]👂 Witness: Martha Wilson, museum janitor[/h3][p]
“Luis? I saw him near the museum late at night. He was standing by the staff entrance with a bag over his shoulder, humming some song about candy… Honestly, I thought he was just delivering a cake for a staff party. Maybe I was wrong?”[/p][p][/p][h3]❓ What do you think, detectives?[/h3][p]
🦷 Do the teeth marks point to Drake? Or is someone framing the candy maker?[/p][p]💬 Share your theories in the comments — soon we’ll take another step toward the truth!
🚨 Let’s go, detectives! Deliver your verdict![/p][h3]
💡 The best theories will be featured in the next post![/h3]

[h3]The cell is empty, the door is wide open. [/h3][p][/p][h3]On the table is a NOT GUILTY sign, thrown down as a challenge to the system.[/h3][p][/p][p]It seems that someone just left...[/p][p]Or did you justify him after all?[/p][p][/p][h3]Add the game to your wishlist on Steam:[/h3][p][dynamiclink][/dynamiclink]
[/p]

[h2]👋 Hey there, judges!
🕵️‍♂️ What’s up, detectives![/h2][p]
New day – new weird case. Grab your notepads and polish your magnifying glasses. Time to solve the crime of the century… or at least the 18th century.[/p][p][/p][h3]📝 Case description:[/h3][p]
Last night something strange happened in the city museum. Someone laid a colorful path of candy leading straight to the “18th-Century Golden Shovel” exhibit.
In the morning, the guards found an empty display and a sweet strawberry smell still hanging in the air.
Suspicion falls on Luis Drake, a local avant-garde candy maker, previously involved in a “chocolate attack” at a modern art show. According to his neighbor, Luis left home late at night with a big bag of sugar and a mysterious smile.[/p][p][/p][h3]🔍 Available clues:[/h3][p]
🍭 A piece of candy with teeth marks
🍬 A wrapper from a strawberry lollipop
🪶 A feather with sugar glaze[/p][p][/p][h3]👂 Witnesses:[/h3][p]
Martha Wilson, museum janitor
Hugh Jenkins, student volunteer[/p][p][/p][h3]❓ Which clue should we examine first? Whose story should we hear?[/h3][h3]
Tell us in the comments – pick 1 clue and 1 witness. We’ll be back tomorrow with more details![/h3][h3][/h3][h3]🚨 Let’s go, detectives! Time to deliver your verdict![/h3][h3]
💡 Share your theories – the best ones will appear in the next post![/h3]

[h2]🌟 Hello, Judges!
🕵️‍♀️ Greetings, Detectives![/h2][p]
This is the end. The clues form a clear picture. The witnesses have spoken. It's time to pass judgment.[/p][p][/p][h3]🖌️ Clue: Empty mayonnaise bucket[/h3][p]
Forensic analysis revealed greasy fingerprints on the handle… and an imprint of a distinctive ring. Only one person in the city wears such a ring.[/p][p][/p][h3]👂 Testimony: Martin Larson, janitor[/h3][p]
“I saw Julia near the park that night. She was carrying something in a bucket and muttering to herself: ‘If Samuel can’t finish it — I’ll do it myself.’ She looked really mad.”[/p][p][/p][h3]⚖️ Verdict: GUILTY![/h3][p]
🎨 Julia Hunt is guilty. She wanted to finish what Samuel started to draw attention to his exhibition. The ring’s print and the janitor’s testimony sealed her fate. Samuel, in fact, spent the whole night working at the gallery.[/p][p][/p][h3]✅ Case Closed![/h3][h3]
Congrats to the detectives who figured out Julia's role. Your sharp thinking deserves praise![/h3][h3]
🔥 But don’t relax — more cases and twisted mysteries lie ahead.[/h3]